international relations theory

Theory Section Redux

by on 2013-04-15- Leave a reply

I want to remind interested parties that we've posted a call for  suggestions for (1) the ISA Theory Section's "Distinguished Scholar" of 2014 and (2) the wording of the book prize. Vocal parties at the 2013 business meeting called for democratizing the process via this kind of mechanism; it would be a shame if Schmitt trumped Habermas when it came to these issues.

Also of note....

Continue reading

The New Structuralism in International Relations and its Discontents: Prefatory Remarks

by on 2013-02-07- 3 Comments

Some years back I participated in a series of workshops that culminated in a book on New Systems Theories of World Politics (value priced at $115). PM and I have been working, somewhat haphazardly, on a review essay dealing with contemporary imperial formations that deals with what I've called the "New Hierarchy Studies." There's also a draft blog post hiding somewhere or other on that subject. But I think that renewed interest in hierarchy might better be characterized by, for lack of a better term, the "New Structuralism" movement in International Relations.

Thomas Oatley's recent posts exemplify a major trajectory of the new structuralism. The first revisits his "Reductionist Gamble" article in International Organization. In his account of why he feels compelled to devote blogspace to explaining his argument, he notes:

It has been met with some puzzlement and it has been misunderstood. I can understand both reactions, as the paper asks people to think differently about the world, and yet it does so by using terms and concepts in ways that depart from more typical usage. I say reductionism, and people hear Waltz. I say system, people here system level.

The problem, as I see it, isn't just a matter of Waltz's use of terms like "system," "structure," and "reductionism" dominating analytical discourse in the field. Waltz's use of these terms aren't even very well understood. They've been ripped from their historical and intellectual context. They've become fetishized, such that Waltz's interventions in older disputes now enjoy ex ante definitional status. The importation of social-theoretic alternatives during the 1980s and 1990s should have improved matters, but in the end they've only muddled the conceptual waters.

Continue reading

A Quarter-Baked Note on Grand Theory in IR

by on 2013-01-31- 8 Comments

Political scientists often say that 'no one reads books anymore.' I'd add that 'almost no one reads book reviews.'

This is a shame. Although most book reviews are paint-by-numbers affairs, some smuggle in provocative claims or important statements about aspects of the field.* For example, in his Perspectives on Politics review of Miles Kahler, ed. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, Zeev Maoz nails an important problem with one branch of work on social networks in international relations:

most network analysts would view the “networks as structures” versus “networks as actors” dichotomy as fundamentally flawed. The various chapters actually demonstrate this point. Even those authors who study networks as actors focus on the structure of the network and its effects on outcomes. Network analysis is capable not only of distinguishing between hierarchies and decentralized forms of connectivity but also of measuring them in quite precise ways.

On the provocative side, there's Cameron Thies' review (in the same issue) of two books, Christopher J. Fettweis's Dangerous Times? The International Politics of Great Power Peace and Gilulio M. Gallarotti's Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations: A Synthesis of Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism.
Continue reading

Podcast No. 18: Interview with Stefano Guzzini

by on 2013-01-18- Leave a reply

guzzini_sThe eighteenth Duck of Minerva podcast features Stefano Guzzini of the Danish Institute for International Studies and Uppsala University . Professor Guzzini discusses, among other things his intellectual and educational background, his important work on power in international affairs, realism, and geopolitics.

This podcast is a bit more "bare bones" than usual. I didn't put in introductory remarks; I have not produced an m4a version at this time. The file located here is the mp3 version. Explanation: I am bit pressed for time right now.

I should reiterate important change to procedures. From now on, the Minervacast feed will host mp3 versions of the podcasts. The whiteoliphaunt feed will host m4a versions of the podcast [note: see earlier remarks about the m4a version of this podcast]. Unless I hear otherwise, we will continue this approach into the foreseeable future.

Continue reading

Podcast No. 15: Interview with Barry Buzan

by on 2012-12-07- 7 Comments

The fifteenth Duck of Minerva podcast features Barry Buzan. Professor Buzan discusses his academic and intellectual biography, his major works, and his ongoing projects. For additional background readers might consult the interview at Theory Talks or at the London School of Economics Department of International Relations blog.  In short, Buzan is a toweringly influential figure in international relations in general, and outside the US in particular. He is also, among numerous contributions to the discipline, a former editor of the European Journal of International Relations.

Continue reading

In the year 2000….

by on 2012-12-05- 6 Comments

Hi everyone. I haven’t been around much lately as I’ve been furiously writing a book. But it is almost done and I’m feeling reflective. Have you missed me? I’ve missed you. What’s that you say? Why yes, this is a new shirt. Thank you for noticing.

I thought that I would offer some thoughts about where I think international relations research is heading in the near to medium-term future, based on what I’ve noticed about the job market, what friends are writing, and the sometimes surprising reactions to what I am doing on the part of others. Obviously this is all anecdotal and unsystematic, as a good blog post should be.

First, we all know that the field is becoming more quantitative, but I don’t think that this is driven by a methodological fetish (at least on the part of those who are doing the work. I think the fetishists are the ones who don’t do this type of work but think it is necessary to have in their department irrespective of its content). I think it owes to a frustration with the inability of previous generations of international relations scholarship to say anything precise and with confidence. Well, let me put that differently. We are looking to say something precise and with accuracy. Some people might have said that states always maximize power but we all knew that was never true. And what does that even mean? What will that proverbial state do on Tuesday? Those arguments are essentially non-falsifiable. They are simply too elastic and too sweeping.

Continue reading

Institutions, Norms, and Cooperation

by on 2012-11-12- Leave a reply

A strong correlation between cooperation and membership in international institutions is not enough to establish that international institutions cause cooperation.   If we're to claim that institutions matter,
Continue reading

Podcast No. 13 – A Conversation with Nick Onuf (mp3)

by on 2012-11-09- Leave a reply

The thirteenth Duck of Minerva podcast features Nicholas Onuf. Nick is one of the "founding parents" of contemporary constructivism. His book, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relation  -- which has been reissued by Routledge -- introduced the term to describe an approach to the study of world politics.
Continue reading

Podcast No. 13 – A Conversation with Nick Onuf (m4a)

by on 2012-11-09- 2 Comments

The thirteenth Duck of Minerva podcast features Nicholas Onuf. Nick is one of the "founding parents" of contemporary constructivism. His book, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relation  -- which has been reissued by Routledge -- introduced the term to describe an approach to the study of world politics.

The podcast is wide-ranging -- part of oral history, part interview, part discussion -- such that I've had difficulty figuring out how to insert chapters. If you're listening via m4a, you'll see that the podcast has only a few chapter titles. "Enter Constructivism," for example, contains not only information about World of Our Making but also about the state of the field in the 1980s, the rise of liberal institutionalism, and so on.

Continue reading

Podcast No. 11 – Interview with Janice Bially Mattern

by on 2012-10-05- 1 Comment

The eleventh episode of the Duck of Minerva Podcast just went live. In it, I interview Janice Bially Mattern of the National University of Singapore. Her first monograph is Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force (Routledge, 2005).

Contents 

  • Front Matter
  • An Intellectual Introduction
  • Ordering International Politics
  • Transnational Organized Crime
  • Hierarchy, Emotion, and Transnational Criminals
  • The Multivocality of Mattern's Work
  • Styles of Reasoning in IR
  • Taking Over the International Studies Review
  • International Theory Redux
  • Working in Singapore
  • End Matter

Note: podcasts now seem to be appearing every Friday, give or take. We'll see how long we can sustain it.

Continue reading

I CAN HAS IR THEORY? 2

by on 2012-10-02- 4 Comments

More slides from the talk after the fold.
Continue reading

Podcast No. 10 – Interview with Vincent Pouliot

by on 2012-09-28- Leave a reply

The tenth episode of the Duck of Minerva Podcast just went live. In it, I interview Vincent Pouliot of McGill University. His first monograph is International Security
Continue reading

Morning Link, with Commentary, on the Shrinking Place of Theory in Sociology and IR

by on 2012-09-19- 5 Comments

I'm crashing on multiple deadlines, so in lieu of "morning linkage"....

Last night I was in a twitter conversation with Phil Arena and Kindred Winecoff about
Continue reading

Podcast No. 8 – Interview with Daniel Levine

by on 2012-09-14- Leave a reply

The eight episode of the Duck of Minerva Podcast just went live. In it, I interview Daniel Levine about his new book -- Recovering International
Continue reading

Constructivism, Social Psychology, and Interlocking Theory (III)

by on 2012-06-27- 10 Comments

From http://www.zazzle.com/This is the last in a series of guest posts by Stuart J. Kaufman of the University of Delaware. Stuart advances a long-running dispute with PTJ about whether
Continue reading

Constructivism, Social Psychology, and Interlocking Theory (II)

by on 2012-06-26- 2 Comments

This is the second in a series of guest posts by Stuart J. Kaufman of the University of Delaware. Stuart advances a long-running dispute with PTJ about whether "what
Continue reading

Communities and otherness: a typology

by on 2012-06-01- Leave a reply

I have long been intrigued by Orson Scott Card's typology of relations to the other, as expressed in his novel Speaker for the Dead. I
Continue reading

Duck on a TRIP

by on 2012-05-30- 12 Comments

The new TRIP survey is out. While the overall findings don't hold many surprises, there are some nuggets of interest. We'll have more to say later, but
Continue reading

Historical Institutionalism and International Relations

by on 2012-04-15- 13 Comments

[warning: this post and the piece attached to is is only of interest to a handful of academics]The April 2011 issue of International Organization included a
Continue reading

What Good is Network Theory in IR?

by on 2012-04-11- 16 Comments

In between ultimate frisbee and lying around in bed sick, I managed to attend a workshop on network theory at the International Studies Asssociation. I
Continue reading